ORGANIZED
CRIME MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT
PART
ONE
by
HOW
IT BEGINS
1.
ROOTING OUT THE ROOTS OF EVIL!
Beware
of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil.
Excerpt
from the notebooks of Lazarus Long, from Robert Heinlein's "Time Enough
for Love" from Rand Lindly’s Quotes <http://www.quotationspage.com>
When
solving problems, dig at the roots instead of just hacking at the leaves.
Anthony
J. D'Angelo, The College Blue Book. Cole's
Quotables <http://www.quotationspage.com>
An
ugly little scenario
It is 1973.1 You
have a problem. You are
frustrated by your inability to control how other people live their lives.
You are certain you have special knowledge or genes that make you
superior to the ignorant masses. You
are one of the anointed, destined to move humanity into a glorious future.
If only the rabble were not too stupid to perceive your innate
superiority.
Unfortunately, the ungrateful ignorant masses would perceive what you
want to do as the ravings of a lunatic and would not want to turn control of
their lives over to you willingly. How
are you and the other anointed ones ever going to get control and do what has
to be done?
You discuss solving this problem with your fellow anointed ones in
Psychology and Social Work degree programs.
You find there are many others who share your views that democracy was
a mistake. Psychologists and
Social Workers, who know what is best because of their innate superiority, are
the only people fit to be in control of government.
(The ideology that psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers
should run the government is called psychocracy2.)
You discover that your views about the inferiority of the masses have a
long tradition in mental health. You
discover some amazing statements by Sigmund Freud that are inspirational for
you:
“What
is the use of Americans if they bring no money?...They are not good for
anything else....America is useful for nothing else but to supply money....Is
it not sad that we are materially dependent on those savages who are not
better-class human beings.” S.
Freud, p.241, Freudian Fraud, E.
Fuller Torrey, MD.
“In
the depths of my heart I can’t help being convinced that my dear fellow men,
with few exceptions, are worthless....I have found little that is ‘good’
about human beings on the whole. In my experience most of them are trash, no
matter whether they publicly subscribe to this or that ethical doctrine or to
none at all.” S. Freud, p.
243-244, Freudian Fraud, E. Fuller
Torrey, MD.
With your world view that the masses are inferior and the anointed
innately superior firmly validated, you and others set about building a system
to finance and orchestrate destruction of the family, religion, democracy and
other impediments to your plan to save humanity from itself.
The only viable course of action is the same one Hitler used,
infiltrate government bureaucracies with allies and seize control by coup.
Just as Hitler did, you will have to create emergencies which what you
need to achieve are the solution to.
Since you can not openly pursue your goals, you must trick the great
unwashed into cutting their own throats.
You must make alliances of convenience with other political extremists
and economic interests. You must
make common cause with intellectual bar sweepings who are true believers in
their outrageous claims, no matter what they are.
People who are so intense, their passions will persuade other people in
the absence of any scientific proof of their claims.3
Among other brilliant enterprises, witnesses go before Congressional
Committees on Child Welfare and testify that a national and international
network of Satanic Cults exists. Witnesses
describe operations to breed babies for human sacrifice, massive kidnapping
networks to steal children for evil purposes, entire communities and churches
of Satanists hiding the systematic and wholesale sexual abuse of children,
tunnel systems are alleged to exist under daycare centers where children are
molested and forced to participate in Satanic ceremonies.
It was a minor inconvenience that a ten year FBI investigation found no
evidence of such massive Satanic conspiracies to exploit and abuse children.4
By then you and your fellow anointed ones had the killing machine5
well under construction using conditional federal funding you had obtained as
a result of the testimony from quack witnesses.
You were eventually so successful at integrating greed and personal
aggrandizement to achieve your goals that grand jury investigations and
comprehensive documentation of the atrocities being committed have failed to
put a dent in the destructive machine.6
After Congress enacted legislation establishing conditional federal
funding programs to achieve your destructive goals, States had to get with
your program if they wanted to receive the federal funding.
Over time, States were forced to enact legislation that included
establishing a corps of mandated child abuse reporters who would be granted
immunity for reporting anything, true or false, yet allowed them to be sued
for failure to report anything that might possibly indicated child abuse.
The legislation placed a long list of professionals in a position where
they were afraid to use their own good judgment.
Children soon learned they suddenly had obtained power and could ruin
the lives of adults, parents, teacher or anyone else, on whom they wanted to
extract revenge for some offense, real or imagined.
A Boolean search of United States Code at
<http://www4.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/empower> using the search term
“condition and federal funds or condition and federal funding” identified
1,203 matches incorporated into United States Legal Code (condit 6078, feder:
12443, fund: 9409). Conditional
federal funding is a powerful and successful tool used in an increasing number
of areas to establish public compliance with extremist and special interest
agendas.
A
little example of the scenario meeting the legal road
The end result of this intentional corruption of government is ugly.
The Ninth Circuit case United States of America v. Charles Bighead
<http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/web/newopinions.nsf/4bc2cbe0ce5be94e88256927007a37b9/698bd1927f235c3e88256927007e0229?OpenDocument>
provides a convenient comprehensive example:
In
rebuttal, the government offered the expert testimony of Tasha Boychuk, the
director of forensic services at the Children's Advocacy Center. Although she
was not a psychiatrist or psychologist, Boychuk testified about the general
characteristics of child sexual abuse victims, specifically about the
characteristics of "delayed disclosure" and "script
memory." Boychuk based her opinions in part on interviews and
observations of some 1200 children who had alleged sexual abuse.
On
cross-examination, Boychuk admitted that she had no way of determining whether
the subjects had actually been abused. Bighead was convicted. On appeal, he
contended that the district court erred in admitting Boychuk's testimony
because it lacked a foundation for expert opinion evidence and went beyond her
own observations. Bighead asserted that the district court should have
determined whether Boychuk's theories could be tested, were subjected to peer
review and publication, and were generally accepted in the field. He also
challenged the testimony as unhelpful to the jury and more prejudicial than
probative.
[1]
Tests for the admissibility of expert scientific testimony do not require
exclusion of testimony that involves specialized knowledge rather than
scientific theory. Boychuk's testimony consisted of her observations of
typical characteristics drawn from years of experience interviewing purported
victims of child abuse. It was not an abuse of discretion to permit it. She
could have been, but was not, cross-examined about the nature and extent of
her reliance on any other source.
[2]
Boychuk testified only about a class of victims generally, not the particular
testimony of the child victim in this case. Boychuk's testimony had
significant probative value in that it rehabilitated (without vouching for)
the victim's credibility after she was cross-examined about the reasons she
delayed reporting and inconsistencies in her testimony. Boychuk's testimony
went to disclosure for the purpose of assistance. The jury was free to
determine whether the victim delayed disclosure or simply fabricated the
incidents. Judge Noonan dissented, explaining his view that Boychuk's
testimony was inadmissible because it was based on interviews and observations
of children who claimed sexual abuse, but were not shown to have been actual
victims of the offenses they reported.
The full text of Judge Noonan’s dissenting opinion in this case is a
“must read.” It provides an
excellent summary of the defective reasoning in this case which is consistent
with systemic corruption behind similar cases that merely present a facade of
justice.
2.
THE LOVE OF CONDITIONAL FEDERAL FUNDING IS THE ROOT OF ALL GOVERNMENT EVIL.
“A
man should not approach a cow that backs up to a tree stump.”
Bubba
Ramdas*, revered country guru from Southern India.
The enticement behind conditional federal funding is that your State
will be paid if State legislation is enacted requiring State citizens to
comply with the agenda of the special interest that obtained enactment of the
authorizing federal legislation. Local
politicians love to hold news conferences announcing they have succeeded in
obtaining federal funding and projecting the economic impact in terms of new
jobs or programs. Not covered at
the press conference is the small print that turns one segment of the State
population into a cash crop that has to be harvested.
It may seem to be a good deal, unless you are a member of the group
being harvested.
The ugliest of the federally funded citizen harvesting projects is the
fraudulent child protection system. Structural
corruption in the child protection system will be the subject of the next
article in this series.
Exploring
Conditional Federal Funding Programs in Your State
1.
Contact your State grant clearing house and ask to be placed on their mailing
list for approved grant reports. Receiving
these regular reports will allow you to monitor who is receiving federal funds
and for what purpose. You should
also be able to review grant applications that were declined at the grant
clearing house. The federally
mandated purpose of the grant clearing house is to review and coordinate all
grant applications originating within the State to eliminate redundant grant
requests.
2.
File an FOIA request to review all the contracts issued by the State agency
you are interested in examining. Look
for contracts with service providers that process federal fund claims for the
agency. Look at how contractors
are compensated. Are they paid a
flat fee for processing the federal fund claims or are they paid a commission
on the increase in federal fund claims generated?
Important
Websites for Government Research
A possibly useful search term to begin exploring federal grant
administration in your State is “intergovernmental services.”
1.
FIRSTGOV: Your first click to the US Government
<http://firstgov.gov/>
2.
FINANCENET: Financial Management in Government
<http://www.financenet.gov/>
3.
US STATE AND LOCAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
<http://www.financenet.gov/financenet/state/state.htm>
4.
STATE FINANCE OFFICES
<http://www.financenet.gov/financenet/state/offices.htm>
5.
STATE & LOCAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DATABASE
<http://fnet.financenet.gov/webinator/cgi-bin/texis.exe/webinator/cgi-bin/exstatedb>
Some suggested lines of research are to conduct searches using
separately and together the name of your state and “intergovernmental
services.” The results of such
searches are quite revealing about how the current family and citizen killing
machine was constructed piece by piece over time by government officials and
employees engaged in apparently innocuous decisions and actions as part of
their governmental responsibilities.
6.
THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ONLINE VIA GPO ACCESS
<http://ww1.access.gpo.gov/GPOAccess/sitesearch/su_docs_aces/aces150.html>
The on-line Congressional Record Archives are only available back to
1994.
*In
case it is not obvious from the name, Bubba Ramdas is a fictional guru created
in 1993 by James Roger Brown as a vehicle to introduce and use country style
witticism, euphemisms, and allegories to communicate or emphasize specific
insights.
Footnotes
1An
excerpt from The Family Defense Manual by
James Roger Brown documenting the development and evolution of anti-family and
anti-male extremist ideology from the mid-1970’s.
<http://www.politicalwomen.com/family.htm>
2Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette, #1. A dangerous political movement, Date: 05/06/98,
Category: Editorial, Page: B9, Byline: JAMES ROGER BROWN SPECIAL TO THE
DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE. Enter search
term at <http://library.ardemgaz.com/>.
Searches are free but the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette charges $1.95 to
read and download archived articles.
3See
(1) Whores of the Court: The Fraud of
Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice, Margaret A. Hagen,
Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc., New York (1997); (2) The
Myth of Repressed Memory, Elizabeth Loftus, Saint Martin’s Press, Inc.,
New York (1996); (3) The Assault on
Parenthood: How Our Culture Undermines the Family, Dana Mack, Simon and
Schuster, New York (1997); (4) Satan’s
Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt,
Debbie Nathan, Harper-Collins, Inc., New York (1996); (5) Making
Monsters: False Memories, Psychotherapy and Sexual Hysteria, Richard Ofshe,
University of California Press, Berkley (1996); (6) Victims
of Memory: Sex Abuse Accusations and shattered Lives, Mark Pendergrast,
Upper Access, Inc., Hinesburg (1996); (7) The
Child Abuse Industry, Mary Pride, Crossway Books, Wheaton (1986); (8) Children
No More: How We Lost a Generation, Brenda Scott, Huntington House
Publishers, Lafayette (1995); (9) Out
of Control: Who’s Watching Our Child Protection Agencies, Brenda Scott,
Huntington House Publishers, Lafayette (1994); (10) Freudian
Fraud: The Malignant Effect of Freud’s Theory on American Thought and
Culture, E. Fuller Torrey, MD, Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc. (1993);
(11) Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse,
Hollida Wakefield and Ralph Underwager, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Limited,
Springfield (1988); (12) Diagnosis for
Disaster: The Devastating Truth About False Memory Syndrome and Its Impact on
Accusers and Families, Claudette Wassil-Grimm, Overlook Press, New York
(1996); (13) Wounded Innocents: The
Real Victims of the War Against Child Abuse, Richard Wexler, Prometheus
Books, Amherst (1995).
4See
F.B.I. 1992 STUDY OF CHILDHOOD RITUAL ABUSE <http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_rep03.htm>
and GOVERNMENT STUDIES OF CHILDHOOD RITUAL ABUSE <http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_study.htm>.
5After
the extremists and organized criminal operations were well established, the
truth began to creep out but the extremists and criminals have yet to be
removed. See:
(1)
TESTIMONY OF CAROL LAMB HOPKINS BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN
RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, May 25, 1995 <http://home.rica.net/rthoma/hopkins.htm>;
(2)
Reason Public Policy Institute. Policy
Study No. 262, “Child Protection at the Crossroads: Child Abuse, Child
Protection, and Recommendations for Reform,” By Susan Orr, Ph.D., October
1999 <http://www.rppi.org/socialservices/ps262.html>; and
(3)(a)
San Diego County Grand Jury <http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/cnty/cntydepts/safety/grand/>.
Go to the search engine and use the terms “child abuse” and
“Alicia W.”
(b)
Lifting the Veil: Examining the Child Welfare, Foster Care and Juvenile
Justice Systems <http://home.rica.net/rthoma/>.
This site probably has the most comprehensive database of critical
information documenting the problems rampant in the purported child protection
system. The following link will
take you directly to STUDIES, SURVEYS, AND AUDITS
<http://home.rica.net/rthoma/studies.htm>
See
especially the Grand Jury Reports section.
©
Copyright October 6, 2000 by James Roger Brown.
All rights reserved.