ORGANIZED
CRIME MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT
PART
SIX
DOING
GEORGE ORWELL PROUD
A
CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM THAT ENSURE THE ABUSE OF EVERY CHILD
WARNING:
THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS THREE CITATIONS TAKEN FROM PHYSICIANS NOTES DESCRIBING
GENITAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE IF MOLESTATION HAD OCCURRED.
THE CITATIONS WERE SELECTED TO DOCUMENT THAT CHILDREN ARE SUBJECTED TO
MEDICAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURES INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MOLESTATION.
THIS IS A SERIOUS ISSUE IN CASES WHERE CHILDREN ARE SUBJECTED TO SUCH
PROCEDURES SOLELY FOR PERSONAL, POLITICAL OR FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION OF A CHILD
ABUSE ALLEGATION. READERS WHO MAY
BE OFFENDED BY MEDICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF A GENITAL EXAMINATION SHOULD NOT READ
THE CITATIONS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PARAGRAPH EXPLAINING "NOSOCOMIAL
ABUSE" AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS ARTICLE.
"Evil
enters like a needle and spreads like an oak tree."
Ethiopian Proverb, http://www.cyber‑nation.com/victory/quotations/subjects/quotes_evil.html
"(24)
Ibid., February 6, 1968. The dispatch read in part: ". . . .'It became
necessary to destroy the town to save it,' a U. S., Major was quoted as
saying. . . ."
" Footnote 24, David Hunt,
"Villagers At War...",
part 8 http://chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/Vietnam/hunt/hunt8.html
More
vital information you would not need to know if everything worked as it should
It is time to do a major vocabulary expansion with the concept "nosocomial
abuse." Nosocomial abuse
occurs when professional conduct produces the very result the professional
conduct is supposed to prevent or remedy.
A person who enters a hospital for treatment and becomes infected with
a microorganism living in the hospital, acquires a nosocomial infection.
When a mental health professional uses junk science to create false
memories of events in a client, the client has developed a nosocomial
disorder. The children who died
in the ATF/FBI raid at Waco, Texas, purportedly conducted to protect them from
child abuse, became the victims of nosocomial law enforcement.
A child whose first forced genital invasion occurs at the hands of a
physician searching for evidence of molestation that never occurred, becomes
the victim of nosocomial molestation.
After becoming the victim of nosocomial molestation, a child may
exhibit the same behavior as a child molested by someone with malicious
intent. The following citations,
taken from the STATE ONE case cited in PART FIVE, document how this can
distort the conclusions reached if additional evidentiary genital examinations
are conducted:
STATE ONE DOCUMENTATION
December
5, 1994
Progress
Notes of (Doctor One) :
(Alleged
Victim)
(Case File Number)
12-5-94
12-5-94
[illegible written notes] reaction to [illegible written notes]
O:
The patient does indeed have mild bilateral otitis media with URI signs
and inflamed TMs, and sluggish. The
pharynx is mildly inflamed. She
does have mild URI signs. Her
lungs are clear. The abdomen is
soft. She has only mild diaper
irritation. Examination of the
internal structures shows intact hymenal ring, which is not al all distended.
There is mild erythema of her vaginal vault, but this is not striking
and represents only mild irritation. There
is no sign of trauma, bleeding, bruising, scarring, etc.
A:
I feel she does have otitis media, mild, plus possible sinusitis.
P:
We have elected to treat her today with Ceclor and we will follow from
here.
(Doctor
One)
March 11, 1996
Progress
Notes of (Doctor One):
3-11-96
["check" symbol] before court tomorrow
03/11/96
(Alleged Victim)
CHART
#: ********
S:
(Alleged Victim)
generally is here for evaluation of possible sexual abuse.
She is brought in here by her mom.
There is a note on (Brother)
on the same day. I know one of
the concerns has been that (Alleged
Victim) will hold her legs together and not want to open them up to
have a diaper change. She
certainly showed some of that behavior today when we initially attempted to
examine her.
O:
She does appear to be bright. She
does have normal tympanic membranes. Her
nose and pharynx seem to be fine. Lungs
are clear. Abdomen soft.
Pulses 2+. Tones, strength
and reflexes are normal. Normal
femoral pulses. Her perineal area
is normal. Over her buttocks she
does have some papules consistent with diaper rash.
The anal area appears to be normal.
There are no scars or irregularities and certainly no acute lesions.
The labia appeared to be normal with no scars noted.
No changes. Her hymenal
ring is small and intact and there are no lesions or scars noted in the
vestibula area.
A:
While physical examination certainly does not exclude more subtle forms
of sexual abuse, at least it is reassuring that more overt forms are not going
on. From the historical evidence,
while I understand the family's concerns and certainly they are very concerned
about this child to make sure that nothing happens to her.
I suspect that at least at this point in time we do not have the
evidence to support allegations of sexual abuse.
P:
Certainly these children need to be followed carefully and watched.
HQR
(Doctor One)
April
27, 1999
Citation
from the report on (Alleged Victim)'s
April 26, 1999 physical examination at ******* ********** Medical Center
PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION: Vital signs were the following: Blood pressure was 108/64,
temperature 38.2, in the left ear and it was checked twice.
Pulse 112, respiration 20. Her
height was 109.5 cm which places her above the 10th percentile.
Her weight was 20 kg which places her in the 50th
percentile. Head, eyes, ears,
nose, throat and neck were within normal limits.
The chest was clear. Heart
was regular without murmur. The
abdomen was soft, no organomegaly noted.
Extremities and spine were within normal limits.
An anogenital exam was performed with the use of a colposcope with
***** ******** R.N. assisting. Tanner
Staging of the breasts and genitalia were I.
Inguinal adenopathy was negative.
Medial aspects of the thighs were normal.
The perineum was normal. There
was no vulvovaginal or urethral discharge.
No condyloma acuminata. The
labia majora and labia minora appeared to be normal.
The hymen was slightly rolled outward and the integrity of the hymen
was verified with an applicator and was free of any disruptions.
The fossa navicularis and posterior fourchette were both unremarkable.
The anal exam revealed that the buttocks were normal.
The perianal skin was normal. The
anal folds and rugae were symmetrical. The
anal tone was good, there was no anal spasm or laxity noted.
There was a midline rectal tag at 12 o'clock.
LABORATORY
ASSESSMENT: A combined vaginal and rectal gonorrhea culture was obtained and
both vaginal and rectal chlamydia cultures were obtained.
ASSESSMENT:
The anogenital findings were unremarkable.
It is important to note that a normal examination does not rule out the
possibility of sexual abuse as the tissue may heal or not be injured in many
cases of inappropriate sexual contact.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It was discussed with the father to assume that all the laboratory tests are
normal unless he is contacted. He
was advised that a copy of the report would be sent to those investigating the
case. He was also advised that
this child needs to receive counseling due to the allegations of abuse.
He was further advised to provide a safe environment for this child.
Nosocomial
child abuse in the name of child protection is a direct product of the
malicious intent of political extremists and sociopathic indifference of white
collar criminals united by their overlapping interests in exploiting the child
protection system.
Another sophisticated logical fallacy, of the bifurcated variety
combined with appeal to fear, is at the heart of this aspect of the child
protection system. The logical
fallacy can be summarized as, "Child abuse allegations, even false
allegations, must not be questioned or children really being abused will go
undetected because adults will be afraid to report child abuse."
This purported reasoning is a bifurcated fallacy because it ignores or
conceals the abuse and molestation of children by individuals operating within
the child protection system. Suggestions
of this logical fallacy are evident in the more crudely stated slogan,
"If we must err, we must err on the side of the child."
One policy priority resulting from this bifurcated fallacy is "unmolested
children should be subjected to the nosocomial molestation of a genital
examination rather than inconvenience adults by determining if they are
falsely reporting child abuse."
Laws have been enacted applying this policy by protecting anyone filing
a child abuse allegation from civil liability for the consequences of making a
false allegation.
A child protection system that protects children from nosocomial abuse
and molestation would first apply any invasions of privacy to adults involved.
Although inadmissible as evidence, conducting immediate polygraph
examinations of both accuser and accused could effectively reduce false
allegations and nosocomial molestation of children by providing preliminary
evidence upon which to base an informed decision about the need to conduct a
genital examination on an alleged victim.
In cases where abuse or molestation is not manifestly evident, not
supported by an eyewitness, or not made in sufficient time for application of
a rape evidence kit, questioning adults under conditions which might reveal
deceit seems more reasonable than placing the burden and trauma of mistakes on
children.
Nosocomial abuse also occurs when children are brainwashed by child
abuse investigators to falsely state that abuse or molestation occurred when
it did not. Other forms of
nosocomial abuse have been intentionally built into the child abuse
investigation process.
Sorting
wheat from chaff
It is possible to distinguish law enforcement officers participating in
the criminal child exploitation process from honest child abuse investigators.
The following brief citations provide examples of how a Captain
questions the same alleged victim as an Investigator who incorporates
brainwashing techniques into the questioning process.
STATE TWO TRANSCRIPTS
Investigator
One
(Alleged
Victim One)
Interview 1, page 5 line 19-24
(Investigator
One):
Okay. Well, you know if something
else happened, some of the other boys may have already told you about it.
But I need to hear it from you, okay?
(Alleged
Victim One):
[unintelligible]
(Investigator
One):
Did you hear about strange games that you all play.
Can you tell me about that? [NOTE:
"Strange games" is a prejudicial reference to standard card and
board games some alleged victims reported playing with each other at the
alleged perpetrator's residence.]
(Alleged
Victim One)
Interview 1, page 9 line 6-10
(Investigator
One):
Well, you don't have to be scared of me.
You're not in trouble. But
I need to know what happened so I can make it stop - to keep him from doing
those things again. I need your
help. Are you sure there s
nothing else you want to tell me?
(Alleged
Victim One):
No.
(Alleged
Victim two)
Interview, page 3 line 17-21
(Investigator
One):
Well, everybody keeps saying that he, that some of the boys boxed naked?
[NOTE: Fictitious event created
by Investigator One and referred to in interviews with every alleged victim.]
(Alleged
Victim two):
No, I don't think so.
(Investigator
One):
But you never have?
(Alleged
Victim two):
Mm-mm.
(Alleged
Victim two)
Interview, page 9 line 3-5
(Investigator
One):
But he tried to show you some dirty magazines? [NOTE:
Another fictitious event. The
alleged perpetrator was purported to possess magazines containing photographs
of naked boxers, but no such material was found during the search of his
residence when arrested and statements made by the alleged victims conflicted
on their existence, in some cases by the same alleged victim in subsequent
interviews.]
(Alleged
Victim two):
He didn't try. He asked us if we
wanted to look at some. Me and
***** said no.
Captain
(Alleged Victim One)
Interview 2, page 1 line 13-17
(Captain): Okay.
And you've been up to his apartment before?
Okay. I already knew that.
Now why don't you just kind of tell me what s kinda going on.
What you know about the (Alleged
Perpetrator) and what you know yourself, not really what any of your
friends has told you or anything but what you know yourself from you going up
there.
(Alleged Victim One)
Interview 2, page 1 line 25-27
(Captain): Okay, not
what she told you or anybody else, but what you know.
Did you...have you talked to any of the other guys that you know of
that had gone up there? Have you
gone up there boxing before?
(Alleged
Victim One)
Interview 2, page 11 line 9-12
(Captain):
Now in amongst talking with your friends and stuff, do you know anybody else,
not what anybody else told you, but I m talking about you talking to one of
your friends, has any one of your friends told you about anything that has
happened to them?
(Alleged
Victim One)
Interview 2, page 11 line 27-page 12 line 14
(Captain):
Alright, now, 'cause I m going to go back out here and I m going to talk to
her. Now you do me a favor, okay?
If there s anything else that you want to go ahead and talk about out
there, I m there or maybe that you forgot about and want to tell me about, you
go ahead and have your mamma get in touch with me and I ll meet you somewhere
and we ll talk or something but don't be worried or scared if you need to talk
to me about something. Go ahead
and I ll be glad to listen. All
we re trying to do up here is find out if anything is going on and if so, what
is going on, you know. And I m
not trying to trick you into telling me nothing.
I m not trying to tell you something did happen if it didn't happen.
I just want to make sure. I
want you to feel good about what we talked about and I don't want you to have
to worry about telling me something, you know, because it, you think, might
embarrass me or it might embarrass you or somebody would get you, one way or
the other. Okay?
So anytime at all that you need to, tell your mamma to call me and you
want to talk to me for a minute.
There is a documentable difference between the conduct of honest child
abuse investigators and the conduct of corrupt child abuse investigators who
engage in the nosocomial abuse of children to achieve the joint goals of
political extremists and white collar criminals who currently control the
child protection system. Ask your
children on a regular schedule what authority figures have talked to them and
what they talked about. Parents
may be surprised at the answers.
A
quick inventory of more ugliness
Under the pretense of making children more comfortable, a system has
been put in place that has the consequence of rewarding children who learn how
to tell child abuse investigators what they want to hear.
Occasionally, this involves ignoring evidence that parents or other
interested parties may have promised rewards to children who report being
abused or molested by a targeted individual.
STATE ONE TRANSCRIPTS
August
18, 1998 interview of (Alleged
Victim) by (Detective One)
and (Caseworker One)
Page
2, lines 40-45
40-41
You can climb up there and you can hold one of those bears if you want
to. Wanna hold one of those bears? ( (Detective
One))
42
Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim/Victim)
43
Okay. You can if you want. ((Detective
One))
44
And look, here's a skunk. (Caseworker
One)
45
There's a skunk.
Page
5, April 19, 1999 (Alleged Victim)
interview by (Detective two)
(Detective
two):
shorts okay, when (Alleged
Perpetrator) touched your cookie and your bum, did he put his
(Alleged
Victim):
when we watching a movie.
(Detective
two):
you were watching a movie
(Alleged
Victim):
no, when
(Detective
two):
when are we going to watch a movie?
(Alleged
Victim):
yeah
(Detective
two):
oh I don't know, I don't know. Um let me ask you some more questions.
Okay now when (Alleged Perpetrator)
touched your cookie and your bum, did he put his hand, did he put his hands on
top of your shorts, was his hands on the top of your shorts or was his hand
under your shorts?
Page
12-13, April 19, 1999 interview of (Alleged
Victim) by (Detective two)
(Detective
two):
oh okay, so um is there, are there any more secrets? Anymore secrets
that you're not suppose to tell?
(Alleged
Victim):
nope
(Detective
two):
okay all right well should we go, go play, okay lets go play.
(Alleged
Victim):
are there some toys in there, lots of toys
(Detective
two):
yeah there's toys out here, yeah you know what, you and your brother
can come over here and pick out a toy and you can keep it.
(Alleged
Victim):
I know I pick one of those
(Detective
two):
did ya
(Alleged
Victim):
I take
(Detective
two):
well take a look through here and see if there's one that you would
like to keep. And we'll see if your grandma wants some,
(Alleged
Victim):
people keep one of these toys,
(Detective
two):
un-huh you pick one
During investigation interviews children may be taught through direct
instructions and leading questions what they are expected to report.
STATE ONE TRANSCRIPTS
Page
9, line 200-page 13, line 282 August 18, 1998 (Alleged
Victim) interview by (Detective
One) and (Caseworker One)
200
Do you know what secret touches are? (Detective
One)
201
What? (Alleged Victim)
202-203
Well that's when like if somebody touches ya and they're not supposed
to be touching ya. (Detective One)
204
Nope. (Alleged Victim)
205-206
Yeah. So what we wanna know from you today (Alleged
Victim) is if anybody has ever touched your private places that wasn't
supposed to. Has that ever happened to you? (Detective
One)
207
Uhm...uh...no. (Alleged
Victim)
.
. . .
212
What about uh...any boys or anything? (Detective
One)
213
Boys did it to it. (Alleged
Victim)
.
. .
219
Did you tell your mommy that, that somebody did it? (Detective
One)
220
Somebody did. (Alleged
Victim)
.
. . .
227
(Alleged Perpetrator)?
Okay. Did that really happen or was that just a made up thing. (Detective
One)
228
That's the make up thing. (Alleged
Victim)
229-230
It was a make up thing? Okay. You can look at me. Let me see those
pretty eyes? (Detective One)
231
Uh-uh. (Alleged Victim)
232-233
Let me see what color they are again, I forgot. Are they pink? Oh,
they're brown, that's the color, they're brown. They're pretty eyes. (Detective
One)
234
You have a pretty smile. (Alleged
Victim)
235
So (Alleged Victim)...
(Detective One)
236
What? (Alleged Victim)
237
Uhm...So (Alleged
Perpetrator), he didn't really touch you? (Detective
One)
238
Uh my mom's husband touched me. (Alleged
Victim)
239
Your mom's husband? What's your mom's husband's name. (Detective
One)
240
Is (Alleged Perpetrator).
(Alleged Victim)
241
Okay. (Detective One)
.
. . .
247
Big (Alleged Perpetrator)?
Okay. So was it just a made up thing or did it really happen? (Detective
One)
248
It really happened. (Alleged
Victim)
249
It did? Because just a minute ago, you said maybe it was a made up
thing. (Detective One)
250
Well it just..It really happened. (Alleged
Victim)
.
. . .
268
But you know what (Alleged
Victim)? (Detective One)
269
What? (Alleged Victim)
270
I need to know a little bit about what happened, okay. (Detective
One)
271
Okay. (Alleged Victim)
272
[']Cause I need to find out so I need your help on that okay. (Detective
One)
273
Yeah. (Alleged Victim)
.
. . .
Page
13, line 290-page 15, line 331 August 18, 1998 (Alleged
Victim) interview by (Detective
One) and (Caseworker One)
.
. . .
292
Okay. Were you on the floor, on the bed or where were you at in there? (Detective
One)
293
On the bed. (Alleged Victim)
294-295
You were on the bed? Okay. So do you remember what kind of a touch it
was? (Detective One)
296
No. (Alleged Victim)
297
I'll show you what I mean cause there's different kinds of touches huh?
(Detective One)
298
(No audible response). (Alleged
Victim)
299-302
Like you can punch somebody (smacking sound), you can poke'em, you can
rub'em like that (soft rubbing sound), you can tickle'em, you can pinch'em,
you can slap'em, you can flip'em. There's a whole bunch huh? What kind of
touch did (Alleged Perpetrator)
do on you, that's what I need to know. (Detective
One)
303
I don't know. (Alleged
Victim)
304
Can you show me how he did it? (Detective
One)
305
Uh-uh. (Alleged Victim)
306
What did he touch you with? (Detective
One)
307
With his finger. (Alleged
Victim)
308
With his finger? Okay. So he touched your cookie with his finger? (Detective
One)
309
(No audible response). (Alleged
Victim)
310
What kind of a touch was it? (Detective
One)
311
(No verbal response). (Alleged
Victim)
312
Okay. That's his finger like that, right? (Detective
One)
313
Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
314-315
So what did he do? If this is your cookie and this is his finger, what
did he do, can you show me? (Detective
One)
316
(No verbal response). (Alleged
Victim)
317-318
Did he just like...remember all the touches I showed ya, there's pokes
and there's rubs like that and you can flip... (Detective
One)
319
Well he touched me like this. (Alleged
Victim)
320
Like a poke? (Detective One)
321
(Inaudible). (Alleged Victim)
322
Okay. And did he say anything to you when that happened? (Detective
One)
Page
21, line 460-page 23 line 498, August 18, 1998 (Alleged
Victim) interview by (Detective
One) and (Caseworker One)
.
. . .
462
has your dad ever told you to tell us about (Alleged
Perpetrator)? (Detective
One)
463
Yes. (Alleged Victim)
464
What did he say to ya, what did your dad say to ya? (Detective
One)
465
He didn't say...he... I don't know what he said. (Alleged
Victim)
466
Did he tell you that he wanted you to tell us about (Alleged
Perpetrator)? (Detective
One)
467
He didn't say that. (Alleged
Victim)
468
He didn't? (Detective One)
469
No. (Alleged Victim)
470
Okay. (Detective One)
471
Oh, her did. (Alleged Victim)
472
What did she say? (Detective
One)
473
Her said tell you guys. (Alleged
Victim)
474
Tell us what? (Detective One)
475
About (Alleged Perpetrator)
touching my cookie. (Alleged Victim)
476
Oh, okay. She told you that? (Detective
One)
477
Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
.
. . .
Page
23, line 512-page 24, line 522, August 18, 1998 (Alleged
Victim) interview by (Detective
One) and (Caseworker One)
.
. . .
514
Okay. What do you think about (Alleged
Perpetrator)? (Detective
One)
515
I don't know. (Alleged
Victim)
516
Do you like him? (Detective
One)
517
No. (Alleged Victim)
518
You don't like him? (Detective
One)
519
I don't like him no more. (Alleged
Victim)
520
Uh-huh. How come your don't like him no more? (Detective
One)
521
Because he touched my cookie. (Alleged
Victim)
522
Okay. Alright. (Alleged
Victim)
The examples used above and in the previous article are not a
comprehensive demonstration of the range of techniques developed and used to
manipulate and exploit children. A
comprehensive evaluation and comparison of all transcripts, audio tapes, video
tapes, witness interview summaries, police reports, medical records, child
protection services files, mental health evaluations, social work evaluations,
and other documents peculiar to specific cases may be several hundred pages in
length and require weeks to complete.
Dealing
with the problem in your state
The consequences of being accused of child abuse or molestation may be
more destructive than being accused of murder.
The transcripts and medical records cited in this and the previous
article document how children are
treated by child abuse investigators and physicians.
The questions asked are all ugly.
Involvement in a child abuse investigation is a life changing event for
everyone. Even if a person is
innocent and not prosecuted, having ugly questions asked about them changes
their life and the lives of everyone who know them.
Think about it. You are
falsely accused of abusing or molesting your own children and are fortunate
enough to be assigned an investigator who is NOT participating in the
political extremist/white collar criminal alliance.
You will be asked if you had sex with your children.
Your children may be taken into State custody and placed in foster
care. Your children will be asked
if you had sex with them. Your
spouse will be asked if you had sex with your children and they knew about it.
Your neighbors will be asked if they ever observed you being violent
with your children or engaging in strange behavior.
Your co-workers may be asked what you discussed with them at work and
social functions. Your bank,
credit card, and telephone records may be subpoenaed to determine what you
have purchased and where you have telephoned.
Your home computer, work computer and floppy disks may be seized and
examined for child pornography. The
fact that you are being investigated may be reported in the local and national
media.
Ultimately, you may be informed by the investigator that the County
Prosecutor has declined to prosecute you.
There is no declaration that you are innocent.
There is no apology. How
do you undo the consequences of all the ugly questions asked about you?
How do you repair the disruption of your family?
How do you recover the financial losses incurred from attorney costs,
therapists, expert witnesses, charges from the State for placing your children
in foster care (that's right, you might have to pay for the privilege on not
being allowed to see your children), temporary housing, bail, and temporary or
permanent loss of employment?
Now, think about the consequences if the investigator assigned your
case is one depicted in these transcript citations.
When your children are asked if you had sex with them, they will be
subjected to brainwashing techniques to obtain false statements from them.
Your children may be told that you are sick and can only receive help
if they say that you molested them. They
will be told that siblings or other children have already admitted you
molested them and the investigator will ask your child for help in putting you
away to protect siblings and other children from future molestation at your
hands. Your children may be
threatened with incarceration, medication, or removal from home if they refuse
to implicate you in acts of abuse or molestation.
The investigator will create fictitious accounts of molestation
attributed to you and ask everyone interviewed to confirm of deny if they have
knowledge of those fictitious events. Even
if you are innocent, the fictitious events will spread through the gossip
network and the entire community will be aroused against you.
All adults and children interviewed will be informed that you need to
be removed from the community and their help will be solicited.
Your wife will be informed that she must testify you molested your
children or they will be taken away and neither of you will ever see them
again. You will be told that if
you do not admit to child molestation your children will be taken away from
your wife and she will be prosecuted for failing to protect your children from
you.
As documented in this series, the conditional federal funding mechanism
has resulted in a child protection system structured to constantly increase
the number of children investigated and taken into State custody.
There is no off switch. If
every individual in the United States were to be investigated and all child
molesters identified, convicted and removed from society, State child
protection agencies could only continue in business if more children were
taken into protective custody.
Nothing currently exists that will protect any family anywhere from
becoming a casualty of this corrupt system, not even innocence.
The only remedy is prevention. The
only prevention is to remove the allied political extremists and white collar
criminals from positions of authority they currently occupy.
©
Copyright March 8, 2001 by James Roger Brown.
All rights reserved.
THE
SOCIOLOGY CENTERTN
220 North Willow, Suite 222
North Little Rock, AR 72114
Telephone: (501) 374-1778
thesociologist@aol.com